Title of Article: “Latino Immigrants’ Children Found Grasping English”
Publisher: The New York Times
Date of Publication: November 30, 2007
Author: Julia Preston
Summary:
This article shows a predictable trend in English language acquisition of Latino Americans. The studies of this article basically show that the longer Hispanic immigrant families live in America the more likely individuals are to speak English fluently.
To cite a graph presented in the article, information is presented on the “Percentage of people in each generation of Hispanic immigrant families who said they speak English very well.” Statistics are presented according to generations labeled: “First”, “Second”, “Third and Later.” It is stated that 23% of “first” generation Latino immigrants claim to speak English very well. 88% of “second” generation families claim to speak well and 94% of “third and later” generations claim to speak well.
Basically, as families enter America, children are very likely to grow into adults who speak English well. Their parents, however, are less likely to grasp the language. Such studies have been done in order to “address rising worries among some voters that immigrants arriving from Latin America in the last two decades have resisted learning English and are failing to assimilate into American society.” (page 1) The report also finds that 46% of Latino adults say that “poor English skills as the leading cause of discrimination against them.”
An interesting finding of this study is that the country of origin of Latino immigrants also seems to play a role in English fluency. It was found that 71% of Mexican immigrants “spoke little or no English.” Puerto Ricans, however, are “the most likely to speak English well.
Tuesday, December 4, 2007
Birmingham mayor seeks low-cost laptops
Raymond Jashembowski
Language Arts and Technology
EDLA 615
December 4, 2007
Current Issue #5
Title: Birmingham mayor seeks low-cost laptops
Publisher: eSchool news
Date of Publication: December 03, 2007
Author: eSchool news staff and wire service reports
Summary:
Low cost computers may be coming to Birmingham Alabama. Following suit with many other cities and countries, Birmingham is trying to be the next participant in the XO Laptop craze that could revolutionize education. This deal would allow Birmingham to provide these laptops for the same price as other developing nations. The deal that is still in negotiations between Birmingham mayor Larry Langford and the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) foundation would provide a laptop for every child in grades 1-8. It would cost about 3 million dollars or approximately $200.00 a piece. If the deal is reached it would be a breakthrough in OLPC’s efforts for American cities to participate. Spokeswoman for OLPC Jackie Lang made this statement for eSchool news, “We have no comment. It is unfortunate that this information was released before any deal was finalized.”
The money for this technology integration would come from two parts, the city budget and private sector donations. The Superintendent of schools for Birmingham also said this deal would give there students a chance to be competitive. The city counsel was to vote on the proposal on November 21, but more time was needed to evaluate the effects of distributing the laptops. Larry Langford and his associate John Katopodis have been successful in the past where they provided computers for kids. They formed Computer Help for kids, which provided rebuilt computers to students in need.
I like the idea as long as there are a couple of factors set up before the computers are distributed. Support needs to be in place for the students and faculty for technical problems and also help when schools are closed and students are trying to do their work at home. If the support isn’t there it could turn into a waste of taxpayer’s money. All in all if the deal is reached and computers are put in the hands of these students’ results will be imminent in a few years.
Language Arts and Technology
EDLA 615
December 4, 2007
Current Issue #5
Title: Birmingham mayor seeks low-cost laptops
Publisher: eSchool news
Date of Publication: December 03, 2007
Author: eSchool news staff and wire service reports
Summary:
Low cost computers may be coming to Birmingham Alabama. Following suit with many other cities and countries, Birmingham is trying to be the next participant in the XO Laptop craze that could revolutionize education. This deal would allow Birmingham to provide these laptops for the same price as other developing nations. The deal that is still in negotiations between Birmingham mayor Larry Langford and the One Laptop Per Child (OLPC) foundation would provide a laptop for every child in grades 1-8. It would cost about 3 million dollars or approximately $200.00 a piece. If the deal is reached it would be a breakthrough in OLPC’s efforts for American cities to participate. Spokeswoman for OLPC Jackie Lang made this statement for eSchool news, “We have no comment. It is unfortunate that this information was released before any deal was finalized.”
The money for this technology integration would come from two parts, the city budget and private sector donations. The Superintendent of schools for Birmingham also said this deal would give there students a chance to be competitive. The city counsel was to vote on the proposal on November 21, but more time was needed to evaluate the effects of distributing the laptops. Larry Langford and his associate John Katopodis have been successful in the past where they provided computers for kids. They formed Computer Help for kids, which provided rebuilt computers to students in need.
I like the idea as long as there are a couple of factors set up before the computers are distributed. Support needs to be in place for the students and faculty for technical problems and also help when schools are closed and students are trying to do their work at home. If the support isn’t there it could turn into a waste of taxpayer’s money. All in all if the deal is reached and computers are put in the hands of these students’ results will be imminent in a few years.
Monday, December 3, 2007
Allyson' Current Issue # 5
Title: Making the case for VoiceThread and interactive digital storytelling
Date: December 3, 2007
Source: The Weblog of Wesley Fryer
Link: http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/11/30/making-the-case-for-voicethread-and-interactive-digital-storytelling/
30th November 2007
We all have problems using the tools that are available to us on the web because of the censorship that school Computer Coordinators and districts feel is necessary.
So my search for a resolution to this giant block on educating our students for the 21st Century I came across this blog.
Wesley Fryer has tried to help a teacher by Voice Thread and has composed an answer and response email for this teacher in the Oklahoma school district.
This information seeks to answer every question that a district might ask and may be useful for some of us who are having a similar problem
I am not able to view the rest of this article so I could not read any of the comments.
Date: December 3, 2007
Source: The Weblog of Wesley Fryer
Link: http://www.speedofcreativity.org/2007/11/30/making-the-case-for-voicethread-and-interactive-digital-storytelling/
30th November 2007
We all have problems using the tools that are available to us on the web because of the censorship that school Computer Coordinators and districts feel is necessary.
So my search for a resolution to this giant block on educating our students for the 21st Century I came across this blog.
Wesley Fryer has tried to help a teacher by Voice Thread and has composed an answer and response email for this teacher in the Oklahoma school district.
This information seeks to answer every question that a district might ask and may be useful for some of us who are having a similar problem
I am not able to view the rest of this article so I could not read any of the comments.
Sunday, December 2, 2007
Amy Marnell's Current Issue 5
Title: Another book-scanning project rivals Google's
Source: Eschool News
Link: http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/?i=50747;_hbguid=c475e569-593b-4573-9777-a46230a76d10
Date: Thu, Nov 29, 2007
This article talks about how almost 10 years ago a computer scientists at Carnegie Mellon University started a project to "Digitize the published works of humankind and make them freely available online." More than 1.5 million books (many of them in Chinese) have been scanned in and 1000's more are being scanned daily.
"Anyone who can get on the Internet now has access to a collection of books the size of a large university library,” said Raj Reddy, a computer science and robotics professor at the university who led the project."
The work has been carried out by scanning centers in India and China with the aid of $3.5 million in seed funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation and contributions from computer hardware and software makers.
Half of the books are out of copyright or scanned with the permission of copyright holders and full texts instead of excerpts of copyright-protected material are expected to become available. Google along with Micro Corp. started a similar project, however Carnegie Mellon representatives say their is the largest university based digital library available and for non commercial reasons.
"Michael Shamos, a Carnegie Mellon computer science professor and copyright lawyer working on the project, said the library’s mission includes making vast amounts of information freely available and preserving rare and decaying texts, among other things. The digital library so far contains books published in 20 languages, including 970,000 in Chinese, 360,000 in English, 50,000 in the southern Indian language of Telugu, and 40,000 in Arabic. "
I think this is an amazing resource and it allows for more global collaboration and research through technology by use of the Internet. The fact that it is available in so many languages relates to our literacy discussions and makes this resource very diverse so that it applies to everyone and not just English speaking people.
Source: Eschool News
Link: http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/?i=50747;_hbguid=c475e569-593b-4573-9777-a46230a76d10
Date: Thu, Nov 29, 2007
This article talks about how almost 10 years ago a computer scientists at Carnegie Mellon University started a project to "Digitize the published works of humankind and make them freely available online." More than 1.5 million books (many of them in Chinese) have been scanned in and 1000's more are being scanned daily.
"Anyone who can get on the Internet now has access to a collection of books the size of a large university library,” said Raj Reddy, a computer science and robotics professor at the university who led the project."
The work has been carried out by scanning centers in India and China with the aid of $3.5 million in seed funding from the U.S. National Science Foundation and contributions from computer hardware and software makers.
Half of the books are out of copyright or scanned with the permission of copyright holders and full texts instead of excerpts of copyright-protected material are expected to become available. Google along with Micro Corp. started a similar project, however Carnegie Mellon representatives say their is the largest university based digital library available and for non commercial reasons.
"Michael Shamos, a Carnegie Mellon computer science professor and copyright lawyer working on the project, said the library’s mission includes making vast amounts of information freely available and preserving rare and decaying texts, among other things. The digital library so far contains books published in 20 languages, including 970,000 in Chinese, 360,000 in English, 50,000 in the southern Indian language of Telugu, and 40,000 in Arabic. "
I think this is an amazing resource and it allows for more global collaboration and research through technology by use of the Internet. The fact that it is available in so many languages relates to our literacy discussions and makes this resource very diverse so that it applies to everyone and not just English speaking people.
Saturday, December 1, 2007
Current issue #5
Current issue #5
New York Grades Set Off Debate on Judging Schools
By ELISSA GOOTMAN and JENNIFER MEDINA
Published: November 27, 2007
Presented by: Nathan jean-jacques
Summary:
The principals from coveted high schools weren’t pleased by the idea of an A through F grading when the chancellor announced the plan last year.
According to Randy J. Asher, principal of Brooklyn Tech:” the decision is ridiculous.
In the other hand, Mayor Bloomberg sees the report cards as a punitive tool against principals. He claims that it is the best way to ”hold a principal’s feet to the fire”.
The grades have given life to a debate concerning school’s assessment.
The architect of the report cards, James S. Liebman claims that he had received emails with the expected question:” How could my school get this grade?” Experience dictates that the grading system has not succeeded in two states where it had been instituted: Florida and California.
The grading system weighs heavily on students’ progress over time, which makes it sound ridiculous that a school like The South Bronx Academy for Applied Media is rated A with just 17percent of its population meeting grade level standards in reading. On the advice by Kati Haycock, director of the Education trust the peer group comparison scheme was abandoned. “We argued as strongly as we could that I a terrible idea,” said she.
Randi Weingarten, president of the UFT, said,” our advice influenced them minimally”
The grades released have triggered a call for change in the city’s plan to assess schools.
Diane Ravitch, historian of the city’s schools, said; it is reductive to give a school, which is a complex organism, a single letter grade. It doesn’t clarify, it oversimplifies”
The implication for my teaching:
Although the report card outcome was favorable; however one lousy report will not change my school’s philosophy and vision. The education of the whole child is our objective. We will continue to collaborate in the best interest of the students because the board of education’ politicized and vindictive approach is detrimental to learning and especially to the learners.
New York Grades Set Off Debate on Judging Schools
By ELISSA GOOTMAN and JENNIFER MEDINA
Published: November 27, 2007
Presented by: Nathan jean-jacques
Summary:
The principals from coveted high schools weren’t pleased by the idea of an A through F grading when the chancellor announced the plan last year.
According to Randy J. Asher, principal of Brooklyn Tech:” the decision is ridiculous.
In the other hand, Mayor Bloomberg sees the report cards as a punitive tool against principals. He claims that it is the best way to ”hold a principal’s feet to the fire”.
The grades have given life to a debate concerning school’s assessment.
The architect of the report cards, James S. Liebman claims that he had received emails with the expected question:” How could my school get this grade?” Experience dictates that the grading system has not succeeded in two states where it had been instituted: Florida and California.
The grading system weighs heavily on students’ progress over time, which makes it sound ridiculous that a school like The South Bronx Academy for Applied Media is rated A with just 17percent of its population meeting grade level standards in reading. On the advice by Kati Haycock, director of the Education trust the peer group comparison scheme was abandoned. “We argued as strongly as we could that I a terrible idea,” said she.
Randi Weingarten, president of the UFT, said,” our advice influenced them minimally”
The grades released have triggered a call for change in the city’s plan to assess schools.
Diane Ravitch, historian of the city’s schools, said; it is reductive to give a school, which is a complex organism, a single letter grade. It doesn’t clarify, it oversimplifies”
The implication for my teaching:
Although the report card outcome was favorable; however one lousy report will not change my school’s philosophy and vision. The education of the whole child is our objective. We will continue to collaborate in the best interest of the students because the board of education’ politicized and vindictive approach is detrimental to learning and especially to the learners.
Andrew's Current Issue 5
Title: Schools face up to global leagues
Date: December 1, 2007
Source: BBC News
Link:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7121718.stm
So, in the spirit of the discussion this week regrding global connections and communication, I found this article to be quite pertinant.
Of course, I always make comparisons between my teaching in the UK and here in NYC, and probably too often look at things through rose-tinted glasses (I hope that's a saying here).
So, it was very interesting for me to read this article having been out of the UK eduction system for 5 years now.
Much like NYC, the UK has a system of grading schools (the recent round of progress resports, and school evaluations is actually an idea from the UK and if you have a Brtish reveiwer, it's because the company the DOE hired, is British).
In the UK, these reveiews (test scores, teacher assessments, inspection reports, etc) go onto something called a League Table. These have been around for over a decade and are the cause of MUCH discussion amongst educators and parents.
Interestingly, the BBC are reporting on new GLOBAL league tables ranking the education systems, specifically in reading scores, and the news isn't great for England, at all.
The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) - http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pirls/ is "an international comparative study of the reading literacy of young students. PIRLS studies the reading achievement and reading behaviors and attitudes of fourth-grade students in the United States and students in the equivalent of fourth grade in other participating countries"
Until I read this article, I had never heard of such a study, and the findings are interesting and eye-opening.
As the BBC reports, the countries making the most significant improvements or gains in literacy and reading skills are
Date: December 1, 2007
Source: BBC News
Link:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7121718.stm
So, in the spirit of the discussion this week regrding global connections and communication, I found this article to be quite pertinant.
Of course, I always make comparisons between my teaching in the UK and here in NYC, and probably too often look at things through rose-tinted glasses (I hope that's a saying here).
So, it was very interesting for me to read this article having been out of the UK eduction system for 5 years now.
Much like NYC, the UK has a system of grading schools (the recent round of progress resports, and school evaluations is actually an idea from the UK and if you have a Brtish reveiwer, it's because the company the DOE hired, is British).
In the UK, these reveiews (test scores, teacher assessments, inspection reports, etc) go onto something called a League Table. These have been around for over a decade and are the cause of MUCH discussion amongst educators and parents.
Interestingly, the BBC are reporting on new GLOBAL league tables ranking the education systems, specifically in reading scores, and the news isn't great for England, at all.
The Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) - http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pirls/ is "an international comparative study of the reading literacy of young students. PIRLS studies the reading achievement and reading behaviors and attitudes of fourth-grade students in the United States and students in the equivalent of fourth grade in other participating countries"
Until I read this article, I had never heard of such a study, and the findings are interesting and eye-opening.
As the BBC reports, the countries making the most significant improvements or gains in literacy and reading skills are
- Russia
- Hong Kong
- Singapore
- Slovenia
All of which, have recently undergone significnt reforms in their education systems, noticeably in both Russia and Slovenia, a move to much earlier starting ages.
With more, similar reports due soon, and recent ones already published, it really is interesting for me to see what is happening globally in terms of literacy education.
For the record, the USA stayed the same in this global ranking.
Friday, November 30, 2007
Current Issue #5 - Justin Fox
Current Issue #5 - Justin Fox
EDLA 615 - Language Arts and Technology
Livening Up Foreign Language
(title linked to article from Techlearning site)
By Harry Grover Tuttle
November 15, 2007
This article speaks of example Spanish and Chinese classrooms, and how they utilize technology to enhance their everyday educational experiences. Amongst the items highlighted by the author, are YouTube, videoconferencing, Flickr.com, translation sites, and online games. The author provides examples of how each are utilized in each of the example classrooms, and how each are integrated into the daily lessons. The author also points out how each enhances the students’ increase in knowledge of each particular language through interaction with native speakers from the country where the language originates.
I found the article fascinating, and well-linked to the current discussion board topic of literacy and language as a global issue. The technologies that the author states are quite useful, and really point out how they can link the classroom with the world beyond it. I feel that it illustrates how these global connection technologies are most useful when talking about the foreign languages. It allows students to gain a better mastery of the language in question by placing them in the actual country where it derives from. What better opportunity exists than acclimating students to the language by mimicking their childhood experiences in learning English here in the
On the negative side, there is a question about implementation. I always say that for such technologies to be pushed forth, there needs to be a conscious effort by the “powers that be” to invest in technology in schools. While it is proceeding, it is doing so at a snail 's pace, especially in the inner city. This needs to change before Tuttle’s masterful visions can be implemented.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)